MetaUser DAO_ White Paper
MetaUserDAO WhitePaper
MetaUserDAO WhitePaper
  • Introduction
  • Project Overview
    • MUD's Solutions and Advantages
    • Ecosystem Strategy and Business Model
  • Technical Architecture
    • Consensus and Core: Cosmos SDK & Tendermint
    • Cross-Chain and Smart Contracts
    • AI-Powered Dynamic Tagging System
    • RWA Asset Mapping Protocol
    • MUD Distributed Storage System (MDN)
    • MUD Oracle Network (MON)
    • Hybrid Consensus and Proof Mechanisms
  • Network Governance and DAO Framework
    • Incentive and Deterrence Design
  • Token Economics and Governance
    • Stake incentive
  • Application Scenarios
    • Metaverse Identity and Immersive Economy
    • Real-World Asset Tokenization
    • Cross-Chain Asset & Identity Coordination
    • Creator Economy and Decentralized Entertainment
  • Roadmap and Strategic Vision
  • Legal Disclaimer and Risk Disclosure
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Credit-Based Decentralized Governance
  • Governance Process:

Network Governance and DAO Framework

Credit-Based Decentralized Governance

MUD employs a novel DAO governance model in which each participant’s voting power is weighted according to their on-chain credit score. This design ensures that governance is meritocratic and inclusive, preventing token-based plutocracy and aligning decision-making power with active and trustworthy contributors.

Governance Process:

  1. Proposal Submission Any token holder with a credit score above a defined threshold may submit proposals related to protocol upgrades, network parameters, or ecosystem initiatives.

  2. Preliminary Review Proposals undergo an initial review by the Community Council, which evaluates feasibility, clarity, and alignment with protocol goals.

  3. Voting Phase Votes are weighted based on credit scores rather than token holdings alone. All voting outcomes are immutably recorded on-chain.

  4. Execution Proposals are executed automatically upon approval by ≥33% of the staked tokens, as long as quorum and majority thresholds are met. This ensures transparency and decentralization without compromising responsiveness.

Note: Detailed quorum rules and safeguards (e.g., vote abstention ratios, malicious behavior filters) are governed by the protocol and subject to DAO amendment.

PreviousHybrid Consensus and Proof MechanismsNextIncentive and Deterrence Design

Last updated 11 days ago